Isnt the statement .with no malice aforethought akin to saying I dont wish to be rude, but. Why make a point of such a statement when the irony is that the whole study is designed to cut down on perceived (and not scientifically backed up) excess treatment which served to harm patients and did not, by any stretch of the imagination prevent illness
We dont exclude the possibility of a similar adaptation taking place behind the scenes, bringing out worse symptoms for a temporary period
They are not FDA-approved to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease
Anti-Inflammatory and Neuroprotective Effects BPC-157 and TB-500 also demonstrate anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties, reducing swelling, stiffness, and pain associated with overuse injuries
The peptide isnt FDA-approved for fertility or reproductive treatments